10 To Midnight (1983) – A Review

Charles-Bronson-10-To-Midnight-1983-thriller-slasher

Cannon Group Pictures presents Charles Bronson as a cop who’s after a deranged serial killer.

A crazed killer is on the loose in the streets of L.A. Warren Stacey (Gene Davis) is an office equipment repairman by day, and at night stalks and murders unsuspecting women. His first victim is found naked in the woods and there’s little evidence for the cop to go on. Removing his clothes while committing his crime leaves little evidence for him to leave behind.

The case falls in the lap of Charles Bronson, a veteran cop who is assigned a new young partner (Andrew Stevens) to work the case. Things get more personal when it turns out Bronson’s daughter Lisa Eilbacher was friends with victim Number One and she inadvertently has fallen into the killer’s crosshairs.

More victims turn up and Bronson is convinced Stacey is behind them all. With no concrete proof, he’s willing to break the law, plant evidence on Davis in order to get him convicted. However, will Stevens support breaking the law to put away a guilty killer?

Charles-Bronson-in-10-To-Midnight-1983-action-thriller“The way the law protects those maggots out there you’d think they were an endangered species.”

J. Lee Thompson directs Bronson for their fourth film together with 10 To Midnight. They’d go on to work together on nine films in total. I guess Bronson and Thompson were comparable to the DeNiro/Scorsese teaming….in a way.

10 To Midnight is something of a hybrid of a cop and an exploitation slasher movie. It’s a Cannon Group film so there’s the usual quality you’d suspect coming from it. I’d say the film is more aspirational than the usual Bronson/Cannon fare that he would come to do for most of the 1980s, but I didn’t find it as entertaining as the gloriouly baffling and low-rent films we’d be treated to from Bronson and Cannon like Death Wish 3.  

There’s not as much Bronson as you’d think in a film he’s the lead in. There’s no series of action set pieces, chases and shootouts Bronson runs through. He plays it fairly sedate with mainly questioning, interrogating and investigating. Fans of his who are more of action-oriented type might find him in 10 To Midnight disappointing. 

10-To-Midnight-1983-Charles-Bronson-Andrew-Stevens-Gene-DavisWhat Bronson gets to run through is standard cop movie fare. All the beats are here – younger rookie partner, getting lectured by superiors (a small role by Wilford Brimley), lone older cop trying to reach out to his daughter Eilbacher, his partner and her have an attraction. It’s all by the numbers and there’s really nothing notable about it.

Even the way Bronson skirts the law to get Stacey arrested and puts Stevens in a corner having to decide to either go along with the ruse or not isn’t very compelling.

10-To-Midnight-1983-Gene-Davis-killer-slasher-exploitation-sexy-victimMeanwhile, Davis fills the other half of the movie. The trashy exploitation level gets dialed up and he goes all in playing one heck of a creepy, unhinged killer. There’s a lot of deadly staring he does, while he runs around naked killing women. Yep, that’s his MO. So his behind is consistently on display – they manage to hide his naughty bits with strategically place furniture and objects.

Davis’ butt should have been given co-star billing. If they show this on regular television I’m sure they’d butcher it more than Davis does his victims. 

The movie is unapologetically exploitative and gratuitous. Davis’ victims are naturally attractive young girls who are either naked or wearing little when his knife flies into them. They’re hacked up and covered in some unconvincing blood (at least I though the blood looked pretty fake). Kelly Preston pops up and goes down as a victim for Davis (she’s billed as Kelly Palzis in the credits). The killing in the woods scene looks like it was lifted from a Friday The 13th film. 

To Davis’ credit his performance shows he’s all in on playing this psychopath killer. It’s not a very subtle performance by him. His motivations for violence is his sexual frustration and he’s given zero sympathy. The audience is not meant to like him in any way. Yet, as over-the-top as he goes, he’s the most entertaining and captivating part of the movie.Lisa-Eilbacher-10-To-Midnight-1983-slasher-thriller

Eilbacher (who would go onto a much better popular film the following year when she co-starred in Beverly Hills Cop) told a story to Johnny Carson about her working with Davis. He had to appear nude in many of his scenes and to break the ice with the other actors decided to walk around naked constantly so they could all get a look see, be done with it and he could relax.

Eilbacher refused to look at his ‘member’ until he resorted to tying a red bow on it, thus drawing attention to it from her. Eilbacher inadvertently took a glance. She was embarrassed, but Davis was relieved she finally took a peek.

10-To-Midnight-1983-slasher-thriller-serial-killer-Gene-DavisWhen Davis is off screen the film drags. It takes a long time to get around to criticizing the crooked wheels of justice, get to the movies core message and Bronson taking it upon himself to frame the guilty Davis.. At times it has a grueling slow pace. At one point I couldn’t believe I was only half way through the movie. 

Of course the climax is Eilbacher in danger, her getting attacked by the crazed Davis and Bronson racing to her rescue.

10-To-Midnight-1983-Andrew-Stevens-Charles-Bronson-Lisa-EilbacherThere are some very ridiculous moments. Davis hangs around the burial of his first victim and happens to overhear the conversations of Bronson from yards away. He’s not very adept at hiding the fact he’s got a screw loose around anyone! Co-workers, the cops, random people on the street – it’s hard not to notice while he might be a good looking guy, he’s definitely an oddball. As I said it’s not a very subtle performance. There are some pretty laughable acting by some of actors, particularly a few of his victims. A few moments of the girls screaming in supposed terror is eyerolling.

According to IMDB three different endings were considered before they settled on the one they went with. It makes me curious what the other two were, because the ending they choose to go with is very unsatisfying. It’s not exactly the escalation of suspense and action Bronson fans are accustomed to. It’s rather meek. When the credits began to roll, that’s when finally wanted to get back to the police procedural portion. Oh now here’s a real predicament Bronson is in! But of course, we never find that out.

The film was pre-sold to foreign distributors before a script was written. The description of ‘Bronson’, ‘violence’, ‘a killer’, ‘a cop’, was enough of lure to get folks interested in it. Once the hook was in, then they decided to write a script.

It’s been said the title 10 To Midnight has no meaning to the film. Cannon Brother Menahem Golan just picked the title out of the air after not caring for the original title ‘Bloody Sunday’. Some fans might argue that they could justify the title, but I think it’s a bit of reach. I have to admit to enjoying the Cannon Group’s complete indifference to logic with their film catalog.

Charles-Bronson-10-To-Midnight-1983-Cannon-Group-slasher-thriller-movieIt is kind of interesting to see Bronson in a more formal role during this Cannon period he settled in. Eilbacher is beautiful and charming (she should have had a bigger career back in the day) and the marring of a typical cop movie and slasher film seems like an interesting idea.

It’s too bad the cop portion was just so ordinary – and with Bronson as the lead it could have been more special. Instead it went with the basics and it’s not worth your time. For hardcore Bronson fans only. 

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.