In The Line of Fire (1993) – A Review


A review of the 1993 action thriller In The Line of Fire starring Clint Eastwood, John Malkovich, Rene Russo, Dylan McDermott and John Mahoney

Clint Eastwood In the Line of Fire

Secret Service agent Clint Eastwood might have let one president be killed on his watch, but he’s not going to let that happen again!

And so begins a very entertaining action movie with Clint doing what he does best, a captivating, intelligent villain, a ‘cat and mouse’ battle between the two with the killing of a president hanging in the balance.

In the Line of Fire was a movie I always considered to be the last great action movie Clint has done. Here he’s running around, pulling out his gun, throwing punches. He would still have movies where he got to stretch some of those elements of that old Eastwood muscle, but none to this degree or this much fun.

Eastwood is Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan. Horrigan is the last active-duty agent from the detail who was guarding President John F. Kennedy on that fateful Dallas day when he was assassinated. He’s still haunted by his failure to protect his commander-in-chief all those years ago, but continues to serve his country.

Wolfgang Petersen In the Line of Fire Clint EastwoodBetween going undercover to bust counterfeiters with his new rookie partner Al (Dylan McDermott), Horrigan spends his off-hours hanging out in a local bar, pouring back drinks and playing the piano.

Then one day Frank and Al get wind of this suspicious character who is gunning for the president. Mitch Leary (John Malkovich) is determined, smart and deadly. He takes an interest in Frank and enjoys pushing his buttons over his botched protection of President Kennedy. He questions whether Frank is willing to ‘take a bullet’.

So Frank gets back on protective presidential duty. Running alongside limos and eyeballing the crowd in an attempt to stop Leary with whatever he’s planning. His age is catching up to him and inevitably we hear the tried and trusted line, “you’re too old for this shit”.

Naturally thick-headed bureaucratic bosses lecture Eastwood every chance they get and believe his actions are a detriment to the president’s image in this reelection year.

John Malkovich In the Line of FireIn between all the phone conversations with Leary and the tracking down of leads, Frank makes time with fellow Secret Service agent Lilly Raines (Rene Russo) and sparks start to fly. Maybe he’s found something more to live for than just playing piano. Now if only he can stop Leary and save this presidents life!

Directed by Wolfgang Petersen In The Line of Fire is a slickly made thriller with two very effective performances at its center. Petersen builds suspense with some nicely put together sequences. They aren’t necessarily original, but they do work remarkably well.

For instance, we’ve all seen rooftop chases before, but the film tries to make this one a bit more special with some creative stunts and camerawork to sell the idea of Clint actually hanging off the side of a six-story building.

We have the big crowd scenes of presidential motorcades, rallies and old footage of President Kennedy with young Clint in the background. The early use of CGI sells this stuff surprisingly well. Of course the story gets a little unbelievable, but it’s hard not to just want to roll with it all and enjoy the ride.

Eastwood and Malkovich are the ideal good guy and bad guy. Eastwood gets to show off a bit more range than his usual macho screen persona. Here he’s a tormented guy so he gets to reveal a softer side in some scenes.

Rene Russo Clint Eastwood In Line of Fire 1993Plus, he gets the opportunity to be charming and romantic as he makes Russo swoon. They have an unexpected chemistry too as they banter back and forth while the romance starts to bloom.

Then Malkovich is a hoot. I think this was the movie that really made him a fan favorite and got general audiences to really take notice of this him. Getting to be the bad guy in a Clint Eastwood movie probably gave him more exposure with general movie audiences than any of his ‘arty’ and less mainstream performances he had done up to that point.

He’s a lot of fun to watch as he morphs into different disguises, his hypnotic quiet voice breaking into uncontrollable yelling and his nonchalant way of dispatching potential witnesses that might mess up his plans. 

In The Line of Fire Clint Eastwood Secret ServiceAt the time of its release the idea of a movie about the Secret Service and portraying a fictionalized president was relatively new. Looking back at all the fictionalized movie and TV presidents we’ve seen since In The Line of Fire could probably fill up the West Wing.

One thing that didn’t work exactly is the film giving Eastwood a memorable line that would join the ranks of his classic and often repeated ones like, “Do you feel lucky?” and “Go ahead, make my day”.

Here it seemed they were hoping Eastwood’s succinct reply to Malkovich’s vow that he will kill the President was groomed for it.  Eastwood answers back, “That’s not going to happen”. The line was prominently used in the teaser trailer, but it never became the signature crowd pleasing line that they probably were hoping would infect audiences.

In The Line of Fire is an entertaining actioner with some good performances, enjoyable supporting actors, exciting and suspenseful chases, and a few killer phone conversations, What else could an Eastwood fan ask for?


2 thoughts on “In The Line of Fire (1993) – A Review

  1. Excellent review of an excellent movie….which I don't think I've watched in nearly 20 years! Speaking of all these JFK-inspired movies, there is a new one called KILLING KENNEDY coming out soon that is a sequel to KILLING LINCOLN (from Bill O'Reilly's pen, evidently) which focuses on the lone gunman theory which I've always disagreed with. Interestingly, though, Rob Lowe will be playing Kennedy; gotta admit I liked James Marsden's turn as JFK in Lee Daniels' THE BUTLER.

    I was hoping for a blog response from you on the Academy Award nominations. I've always had a love-hate relationship with the Oscars: more often than not, I tend to agree with nominations and eventual winners, yet the politics have always bothered me…not to mention million-dollar gift baskets in a Great Recession, know what I'm saying?

    My favorite nomination was for jackass presents: bad grandpa for Best Makeup & Hairstyling and you know what….they should win! Johnny Knoxville spent 3 hours (5 hours when his shirt had to be off) in a chair every day to be transformed into 86-year-old Irving Zisman. Just watched AMERICAN HUSTLE last night which everyone thought was going to be a shoo-in for this category but think about it: all those actors work in controlled environments and get an endless number of takes to get it right. Johnny Knoxville did a 10-month shoot in an UNCONTROLLED environment, being threatened constantly by ordinary citizens who wanted to kick his ass…all believing he was, in fact, Irving Zisman. Watching the movie tomorrow and I can't wait! 🙂 Take care Hap! 🙂

  2. Don't think that this was John Malkovich's big break, it DEFINATLEY WAS his big break. His performance in this movie cemented him as a bonafide star. After this movie, he was in all the entertainment magazines, and entertainment television shows. Even got a Academy Award nod, though he didn't win. You could even say that we wouldn't of had "Being John Malkovich" without "In the Line of Fire." And I think the world is a better place for it.

    This was also composer Ennicoe Marconnie's last movie as well. The rumor is that Eastwood asked him back out of retirement to do the score because he had such faith in this film. While the music isn't as memorable as "The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly" it does deliver on the tension.

    Also, according to the Internet Movie Firearms Database, the gun in this movie(people who have seen this know what I'm talking about) had to be destroyed. There are photographs of the pieces after they were done. Too bad, that would have been a great prop to keep.

    I would consider this the high point in Wolfgang Peterson's career in America. The only other success he's had was with "The Perfect Storm" but after that there hasn't been anything to write home about.

    Fred Thompson may have gotten a bit of a boost from this film. He may have finagled a few more actings thanks to the success of this fim.

    This movie was probably the last of the pre-internet films. Where no one talks about the emails, video conferencing, or voicemails. There are certain sequences where today's audiences wonder why certain agents didn't have cell phones to call ahead. And also seem to use paper instead of just emailing information to each other.

    The wonder is why this film seems to be slipping back to obscurity. It was really good and really successful. But nowadays its considered a hidden cinematic gem. Something you stumble upon to watch on a Friday night. That, if you ask me, is sad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *